Leon Speed ---
 
Ever wondered how money is created and who prints it? After watching this you will realise that it is one big scam. A famous German Jewish banker, Mayer Amschell Rothschild, once said ‘Let me issue and control a nations money and I care not who makes the laws’.
Henry Ford, the founder of Ford motor cars said ‘It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a REVOLUTION before tomorrow morning.’ Nathan Mayer Rothschild said ‘I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.’
The Holy Bible when speaking of God’s chosen children (Israelite's) states in Deuteronomy 15:6 ‘For the Lord thy God blessed thee, as he promised thee: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shalt not reign over thee.’
 
The central banks of a country are privately owned, have no allegiance to any particular country, and print our money. Our banks are allowed to borrow money they don’t have through what is called fractional reserve lending. This means the banks therefore create money from nothing while the people create their money earned through their labour and time.
Hungary has recently (July 2016) become the first European country to ban Rothschild’s banks. Russian President Vladimir Putin, after banning Rothschild’s from his country, said ‘They do not own the world, and they do not have carte blanch to do whatever they want. If we do not challenge them there will be other issues. We will not be bullied by them’. Now if only other country’s leaders were actual leaders and not salespeople they could get rid of this scam that is Rothschild’s banks and save their people from debt slavery.




                          This short clip is from Godfrey Bloom who is a member of the European Parliament.

This video is a must watch on how money is created from Mike Maloney.

Leon Speed ---
 
The following are excerpts from a great article from Dr. Tim O’Shea on the peanut allergy epidemic and its link to vaccines.
This link has been known and kept secret from the public since 1973;
‘The first study of peanut allergies was not undertaken until 1973. It was a study of peanut excipients in vaccines. Soon afterwards, and as a result of the attention from that study, manufacturers were no longer required to disclose all the ingredients in vaccines’.
 
‘Although peanut allergies became fairly common during the 1980s, it wasn’t until the early 1990s when there was a sudden surge of children reacting to peanuts – the true epidemic appeared. What changed? The Mandated Schedule of vaccines for children doubled from the 80s to the 90s’:
1980 – 20 vaccines
1995 – 40 vaccines
2011 – 68 vaccines
‘It would be imprudent enough to feed peanuts to a newborn, since the digestive system is largely unformed. But this is much worse – injecting intact proteins directly into the infant’s body -- in 36 vaccines before the age of 18 months’.
 
The full article can be read at the link below.
http://www.thedoctorwithin.com/allergies/vaccines-and-the-peanut-allergy-epidemic/

Leon Speed ---
 
I have discovered my country Australia and my State of Queensland are registered as a corporation with the security exchange commission in the US. Our treasury department is also listed as Queensland Treasury Corp. Many government seals and crown emblems have been changed to suit. An example is our currency once had 'Commonwealth of Australia' written on it, now it just reads 'Australia'. My birth certificate suggests I was born IN Queensland and not OF Queensland therefore that is my corporate identity and their asset to The State of Queensland Corporation. The more certificates and training we do the more the asset is worth. More on birth certificates HERE.

The name on my driver’s license is in capitals suggesting this is my legal contract with The State of Queensland. At the bottom of Queensland’s Department of Transport and Main Roads website it has written, c (within a circle) the State of Queensland (Department of Transport and Main Roads) Queensland Government. Our registration papers show that Queensland’s Department of Main Roads has an Australian Business Number (ABN). Why does a Government Department need an ABN? The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) website shows us at the top it is Australian Government yet at the bottom it shows the c (within a circle) Commonwealth of Australia. The ATO also has an ABN. The ATO is also found to be an illegal entity by Larry Hannigan who has done extensive research on the matter.

FORM 18-K/A
For Foreign Governments and Political Subdivisions Thereof
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT NO. 1
to
ANNUAL REPORT
of
QUEENSLAND TREASURY CORPORATION
(registrant)
a Statutory Corporation of
THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA
(co-registrant)
(names of registrants)
Date of end of last fiscal year:
June 30, 2015
SECURITIES REGISTERED
(As of the close of the fiscal year)
 
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/852555/000119312516490674/d150065d18ka.htm

Our Constitution, the Commonwealth of Australia 1901 has also been changed without consent from the people as it is stated. The new Australian Constitution is now named ‘Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act’. All these changes started in 1973 and any laws or statutes we now have should be void. The police force, therefore, has no rights as they work for a Corporation and not for the people. Our Police Force has also been altered to suit the Corporation. In 1990 the name was changed from the Queensland Police Force to the Queensland Police Service and the motto even changed from “Firmness with Courtesy” to “With Honour We Serve”. Who do they serve with honour? They serve the Corporation and not the people.

According to the ABC propaganda machine anyone who wants to be a sovereign citizen and not controlled by an illegal corporation are considered domestic terrorists. They state a sovereign citizen * Does not accept Australia’s legal framework or Government. * They consider themselves outside the law. * They should be considered a potential terrorist. * The FBI considers them domestic terrorists.

Here is a pic of a 'sovereign citizen' or better known to fools as a 'domestic terrorist'.

This is a petition on change.org from Barry Powell….

‘The Australian Government is NOT the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia as prescribed in the Constitution, the Commonwealth of Australia 1901.
The Australian Government is nothing more than a company pretending to be the Commonwealth of Australia.
Today, more and more Australians than ever are asking the question ... why are there two commonwealths of Australia? And how did this happen?

In 1901, the Commonwealth of Australia .... a legal binding contract ... was accepted by you my people.
But over the last 113 years there has been many truths kept hidden from you.
The Commonwealth of Australia is the rule of law ... meaning it applies to everyone, including judges, solicitors, politicians - even policemen and women.

The Commonwealth of Australia, the legal binding contract was built on Common Law of England and the Magna Carta .... and they don’t want you knowing this ... and do everything possible to keep you from knowing.
They hide it in acts, deny it in our courts and come up with excuses like ... sorry the Magna Carta is not valid today as it has been over written by law.
This is wrong my good people ... and the evidence is there when you know where to look.
The Magna Carta today is still proudly sitting on display in parliament house ... in fact the monument is still outside parliament in Canberra today.
When we go looking into the acts and statutes we can find them hidden in QLD, Victoria, ACT, NSW ... and is even still valid in UK legislation.
 The Magna Carta is common law ... it is part of me today.

No freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be dispossessed of his freehold, or liberties or free customs, or be outlawed or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will we pass upon him, nor condemn him, but by lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land. We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either justice or right. 

 This can be found today in ....
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY Consolidated Acts ~ MAGNA CARTA 1297 Section 29.*AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY Consolidated Acts ~ IMPERIAL ACTS APPLICATION ACT 1986 SHEDULE 3.AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY Numbered Acts ~ LEGISLATION ACT 2001 SCHEDULE 1.  Magna Carta 1297.VICTORIA CONSOLIDATED ACTS. Imperial Acts Application Act 1980 ~MAGNA CARTA 1297 Justice & Liberty XXIX.*VICTORIA CONSOLIDATED ACTS. Imperial Acts Application Act 1922 ~1297 25 EDWARD I. MAGNA CARTA C.XXIX.NEW SOUTH WALES CONSOLIDATED ACTS. Imperial Acts Application ACT 1969 ~ Sect 43 Sch 2/1297 25 Edward I.QUEENSLAND CONSOLIDATED ACTS. Imperial Acts Application Act 1984 ~Schedule 1/  1297 25 EDW 1 C 29.NEW ZEALAND ACTS. MAGNA CARTA 1297 ~ Section 29 / Administration of Justice.NEW ZEALAND ACTS. IMPERIAL LAWS APPLICATION ACT 1988 SCHEDULE 1 ~ 1297 section 29.UNITED KINGDOM LEGISLATION ~ MAGNA CARTA 1297 Administration of Justice Section 29. UNITED KINGDOM LEGISLATION ~ MAGNA CARTA ~ Confirmation of the Charters Act 1297.

 And so there you have it ... hidden in plain sight.
There are many others they do not want you knowing still valid today, such as ... the Act of Settlement 1700, the Bill of Rights 1688, Criminal and Civil Justices Act 1351, Free Access to Courts Act 1400, the Petition of Right 1628, the Magna Carta 1297 , Habeas Corpus Act 1640, Due Process of Law 1354 and 1368 ...
And are all part of me today ... and is common law.
 In 1215 King John who was behaving like a dictator was forced with a knife under his throat to agree to sign the Magna Carta ... a peace treaty by the barons which was done for the commons.
That peace treaty ... the Magna Carta 1215 is not part of any parliament today.
The commons is you my people ... and the commonwealth means the common peoples wealth and includes the land.
 No act, statute or any member of parliament, judge, legislator can argue that it is not valid today.

 The prime minister Gough Whitlam, with no authority or permission by the commons or the commonwealth, amended the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and created the Acts Interpretation Act 1973; where unlawfully, created a corporate seal of no authority. The Corporate seal of no authority was created in the Royal Style and Titles Act 1973. In the Acts Interpretation Act 1973 they created  their “Australia”. Their “Commonwealth” means their “Commonwealth of Australia” in a geographical sense, and copied the act where amendments where made ... remove the people from the commonwealth ... and created his own Commonwealth of Australia in a geographical sense.
 They also deleted “Government of the commonwealth of Australia”, and created “Australian Government” as a Company. They also created their own Gazette. Removed were other definitions such as “Parliament of the commonwealth of Australia” to be replaced by the corporation called  “Australian Parliament”. This my people is a breach of the constitution the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 and the rule of law.

 In the same year ... 1973 the Royal styles and titles act 1953 was also repealed and the royal styles and titles act 1953 ... which in effect ... removed the queen of england , Her Most Excellent Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second.
This is where the Statute created Queen of Australia instrument was established ... with no authority ... no permission by the common people ....and a direct breach of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901.
The Queen of Australia, a statute instrument, is not worth the paper it is written on and it not recognised by the Garter King of Arms College in London.

 Remember ....the commonwealth means... the common peoples wealth ....the parliament means ... the common peoples parliament ....Common law of England is the law of the people ....The book of rules for all. Her Excellent Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second is the Sovereign of the people. The people are her subjects. Her Majesty holds the land in trust for the people. Her Majesty is the keeper of the law of the people. Her Majesty is the current holder of the Crown.

Once the Corporate seal of the Australian Government was created ... the same year... 1973 ... many acts and statutes were repealed and new ones created such as:
: The Australian Citizenship Act 1973, removing the term “British Subjects” and thus changing and forcing  “Australian Citizen” as corporate entities into their corporate Government with a seal of no authority. This took away our protection under the Queen Her Most Excellent Majesty by removing the term “British subjects”
: The Banking Act 1973 Therefore taking over the Banks 
: LANDS ACQUISITION ACT 1973 - this gave them the right to take land whenever. 
: Statute Law Revision Act 1973 - this Act took out “ of the Commonwealth” from all the Acts and Territories, therefore taking over assets Definition of Commonwealth, which is clear and unchallengeable, according to the express wording of the Preamble and the first six clauses of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, and removing Great seal of the Commonwealth and replacing it with Great Seal of Australia destroying the Commonwealth, Making the Defence Force personal Mercenaries.
... and then in 1974 , the following year 
: Banking Act 1974 - This Foreign Parliament of Australia them printed their own Money “Australia” (in a geographical sense)  with NO guarantee as registered under United States Patent and Trademark Office 89000474 “of the Commonwealth” and the Crown has been removed and is not legal tender currency, is therefore counterfeit to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, NOT the People of the Commonwealth's DEBT.
: GOVERNOR-GENERAL ACT 1974 - The Governor General is now in the Foreign Parliament and doesn’t represent Her Most Excellent Majesty.

: PARLIAMENT ACT 1974 - An Act to determine the site of the New and Permanent Parliament House. This is for their Foreign Parliament of Australia’s Parliament House. The Federal Parliament and the State Parliaments are not sovereign bodies; they are legislatures with limited powers, and any law which they attempt to pass in excess of those powers is no law at all, it is simply a nullity, entitled to no obedience.
and it does not stop there... 1975, 1976 and 1979 ...
: Family Law Act 1975 - Creating their own family court
: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 - Creating their own Federal court
: Australian Federal Police Act 1979 - Creating their own Commonwealth police
: High Court of Australia Act 1979 - Creating their own high court and many many more, all done with no Authority and No permission by the Common people, which violates section 128 of an act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1901.

 Since 1973 no act or statute has Royal assent, properly proclaimed or in the correct gazette as required by law.
One must ask, just how does a statutory created Queen of Australia give royal assent to ... a statute ?
The greedy politicians were so worried the people would find out they even removed the death penalty for treason in the DEATH PENALTY ABOLITION ACT 1973.

 In 1986, the Australian ACT 1986 was brought into law with no Referendum ... it states “An Act to bring constitutional arrangements affecting the Commonwealth and the States into conformity with the status of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and federal nation.”      How can we conform to Australia in a geographical sense, that Australia is NOT the Australia under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, The Commonwealth of Australia under the Constitution is NOT Sovereign and NOT Independent?
The Australian Act 1986 breaches Section 109 - When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.
s118   Full faith and credit shall be given, throughout the Commonwealth to the laws, the public Acts and records, and the judicial proceedings of every State.
s128   No alteration diminishing the proportionate representation of any State in either House of the Parliament, or the minimum number of representatives of a State in the House of Representatives, or increasing, diminishing, or otherwise altering the limits of the State, or in any manner affecting the provisions of the Constitution in relation thereto, shall become law unless the majority of the electors voting in that State approve the proposed law.

in 1988 Prime Minister Bob Hawke amended Section 80 of the Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act, replacing “common law of England” with “common law in Australia” of the Judiciary Act 1903 No 6. Therefore giving all rights and assets to the Foreign Parliament and Government of Australia by removing every right of the Peoples.
The Australian Common Law is NOT Valid today, does not have royal assent, is not lawfully proclaimed and is NOT in the correct gazette. Australian Common Law ... a Statute, cannot over rule or supersede the English Common LAW.
Today it is more important to spread the awareness of what is going on.

The Magna Carta 1215 is valid today ... always has been, always will be. Only the people as a whole can agree that the Magna Carta is not valid and not by some act in parliament or and silly politician. Use it as your protection against these dictators who are lying to you. Section 61 may be the last defence you have.
 Magna Carta gives us the people the right of resistance.
 In 1688 the Catholic King James the second was deposed in favour of protestants William and Mary, not least in order to dispose of the divine right of kings , the day before their coronation they signed papers acknowledging that the royal prerogative is held under the constitutional restraint of the laws and the customs of England.
 In 1765 Sir William Blackstone, a judge, affirmed the constitutional settlement of the glorious revolution of the 1689 to be the undeniable duty of the king, the government and parliament alike.
 The constitution, whether it be England or the Commonwealth of Australia 1901 as an obligation is contracted by all crown servants who are bound to comply with their Oaths of allegiance and office in obedience to the constitutional law.
 The settlement of the glorious revolution reasserted "supremacy" of legitimate power in the Rule of Law. It did NOT give supremacy to the Monarchy or to any parliament, the prime minister, the executive or the Crown in Parliament.
 It sought to maintain the power in THE RULE OF LAW and uphold the liberty and freedoms of the Common people. These rights were entrenched so that parliaments remit is invariably and impartially to maintain them and not to diminish them.
This entrenchment binds the crown in all use of prerogative and all legitimate power emanates from some use of the prerogative.
All statute power gains its initial authority from the Prerogative of Royal Assent.
The public trust placed in our politicians is a matter of contract and law requiring them to perform this duty.
It preserves our spiritual and civil rights and properties as per Coronation oath of William and Mary.
It creates a legal duty to maintain the constitution at all times. The Coronation is INVOILATE , meaning intact , unbroken.
It should be noted as many people will claim that the Magna Carta is not valid and was scrapped by other amendments, this is untrue. The Magna Carta 1297 is a statute and therefore open to repeal however ... the Magna Carta 1215 was a treaty which means it cannot be repealed by any act of parliament as they did not create it.
 Article 61 of the Magna Carta tells us ....we have the right to enter into a lawful rebellion if we feel we are being governed unjustly.
Contrary to belief the Sovereign Queen Elizabeth the second and HER Governments are ONLY there to Govern us and NOT rule us and this must be done within the constraints of the English Common Law.
 NOTHING can become LAW in Australia if it falls outside this simple constraint.
 
Article 61 shows us quite clearly who holds the power - the people. We have Sovereignty, not any parliament, and nor can this be taken from us by any parliament.
Any act passed by parliament to remove the power the people possess or to remove the power from the point of constraint we invested the power in is INVALID, as it falls outside of the constraint laid down by the English common law and Constitutional law.
This is a simple safeguard put in place to protect our freedoms asserted to us, any attempt to do so would be unjust, invalid and certainly illegal.
Today the Australian Government is unjust, invalid and certainly illegal. This gives us the right to enter into lawful rebellion under the full protection of the constitutional law.
Lawful Rebellion allows the refusal to pay any form of tax, fines and any other forms of monies to support and or benefit said unlawful governance of Australia.
Full refusal to abide by any law, legislation or statutory instrument invalidity put in place by said unlawful governance that is in breach of the constitutional safeguard.
 To hinder in any way possible all actions of the treasonous Government of Australia who have breached the constitutional safeguard, defined with no form of violence in anyway, just lawful hindrance under freedom asserted by Constitutional Law and article 61 of the Magna Carta 1215.
The Magna Carta stands for freedom that the people have sovereignty that cannot be removed by anyone other than the people, and it stands for the only real true law as far as constitutional aspects go and that no one without exception is above the law.
Today you can help create awareness by Purchasing this shirt and wearing it into the courts, in public or wherever and remind them it is the People who hold the power.
 I am the rule of law that no one can dispute and the rule of law shall protect you ... with a lawful rebellion.’

Leon Speed ---
 
Shane Bauer is a journalist with Mother Jones and he has done something very few do these days to get the truth. He has applied for and gained a position as a guard with a private prisons contractor, Corrections Corporation America (CCA). According to Mother Jones CCA run 14 Federal prisons, 9 immigration detention centres, and 4 jails.

Being a private company naturally they do what they can to keep as much money as possible, so this means poor pay for guards, limited resources for guards and prisoners, and fewer guards employed. Politicians sell the idea of privatisation to the people as a good idea suggesting privatisation will bring efficiency and employment. This a sales pitch as in nearly every case the first thing that is done is to reduce costs in anyway possible and this usually means less people employed and less resources. In 4 months as a guard Shane witnessed regular stabbings, lockdowns, an escape, and even an intervention by the State Department of Corrections as CCA struggled to control the prison.

Shane used CCA documents to assist with his investigation. These included court filings, state records, and CCA policies to name a few. He also used hidden cameras and voice recorders. Shane spent 4 months as a guard starting in December 2014 and as a result of his investigations recent release, the Department of Justice (DOJ) ended its contracts with private prisons and CCA shares plummeted.

Leon Speed ---
 
Ever wondered what’s in the vaccines that parents are forced to inject into their children at the behest of salespeople acting as politicians?, and on the advice of patent owners who are on certain pro vaccine boards such as Paul Offit who has gained the nickname of “Paul for profit Offit”. A list of ingredients can be found at this link from the Centres for Disease Control and prevention (CDC);
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf


This is a snippet from the ingredient list for MMR(MMR-II) and MMRV(ProQuad)

The MMR vaccine has WI-38 listed as an ingredient in that particular vaccine. This comes from aborted human foetuses.
Kenyan Dr. Ngare’s statement: The ministry of health, Kenya Medical Association, WHO and UNICEF have all stated repeatedly that the vaccines are safe, yet they have not provided any scientific evidence of the same to date.
 

In the video below a concerned citizen has telephoned Merck, who is the manufacturer of the vaccine, to ask some serious questions regarding WI-38.

RELATED ARTICLES;
https://vactruth.com/
CDC director resigns
Dr. Daniel Kalb MD, MPH, FAAFP stops vaccinations at his clinic
Manipulated vaccine studies
Corrupt research scientist